<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4-beta" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Greasemonkey Scripts</title>
	<link>http://feedlounge.com/blog/2005/06/23/greasemonkey/</link>
	<description>FeedLounge is a state of the art web-based feed reader.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 11:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4-beta</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Business Career Center</title>
		<link>http://feedlounge.com/blog/2005/06/23/greasemonkey/#comment-49058</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 08:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://feedlounge.com/blog/2005/06/23/greasemonkey/#comment-49058</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Business Career Center&lt;/strong&gt;

I couldn't understand some parts of this article, but it sounds interesting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Business Career Center</strong></p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t understand some parts of this article, but it sounds interesting
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alex</title>
		<link>http://feedlounge.com/blog/2005/06/23/greasemonkey/#comment-90</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2005 20:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://feedlounge.com/blog/2005/06/23/greasemonkey/#comment-90</guid>
					<description>I wouldn't say that users are "perfectly within their rights to do so" in all cases. A web site or service provider could choose to have a terms of service that disallowed this type of modification. A service provider could also have more focused restrictions. For example: "users may not use any external scripts or tools to disable the display of advertisements in service X". Since advertisements generally are there to cover costs and allow a service provider offer a free version of the service, this type of policy would make sense to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t say that users are &#8220;perfectly within their rights to do so&#8221; in all cases. A web site or service provider could choose to have a terms of service that disallowed this type of modification. A service provider could also have more focused restrictions. For example: &#8220;users may not use any external scripts or tools to disable the display of advertisements in service X&#8221;. Since advertisements generally are there to cover costs and allow a service provider offer a free version of the service, this type of policy would make sense to me.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ray Booysen</title>
		<link>http://feedlounge.com/blog/2005/06/23/greasemonkey/#comment-89</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2005 19:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://feedlounge.com/blog/2005/06/23/greasemonkey/#comment-89</guid>
					<description>I am glad someone realises that users will change the way webpages are viewed and are perfectly within their rights to do so.  Right On!

Now where is that beta invite? :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad someone realises that users will change the way webpages are viewed and are perfectly within their rights to do so.  Right On!</p>
<p>Now where is that beta invite? <img src='http://feedlounge.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
