Greasemonkey Scripts
I posted a couple of Greasemonkey scripts (and bookmarklet equivilents) for FeedLounge on my blog today. Here at FeedLounge we have the following attitude about user scripts:
- They’re awesome
- They’re awesome
It’s a high compliment when someone loves a tool enough to take the time to write a customization for it. Of course, if there any scripts that cause performance issues, etc. for the service we’ll try to address them on a case by case basis.
Stephen O’Grady wrote recent blog entries about Gmail and Greasemonkey. Some of the basic points that resonated with me as a service provider were that these scripts are really useful for power users and that, if possible, service providers should do their best to work nicely with the script developers whenever possible. Makes sense to me. As previously mentioned, I’d love to see an outside developer create a notifier app before we get around to it - it’s a win-win situation. Users get the notifier app faster and we can continue working on core features.
Because I think that FeedLounge is the kind of app that people will write scripts for, we’re working hard to try to get naming and other details set before we get into our beta release. Building on top of an application that is still in rather rapid development is a receipe for frustration - both for developers and for users.
I look forward to seeing what kinds of scripts and add-ons people create for FeedLounge.

I am glad someone realises that users will change the way webpages are viewed and are perfectly within their rights to do so. Right On!
Now where is that beta invite?
I wouldn’t say that users are “perfectly within their rights to do so” in all cases. A web site or service provider could choose to have a terms of service that disallowed this type of modification. A service provider could also have more focused restrictions. For example: “users may not use any external scripts or tools to disable the display of advertisements in service X”. Since advertisements generally are there to cover costs and allow a service provider offer a free version of the service, this type of policy would make sense to me.
Business Career Center
I couldn’t understand some parts of this article, but it sounds interesting